data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27752/27752ad4a35ced2931acd4566479d6acb9bff917" alt="COMPARISON OF THE OVERALL PERFORMANCE (%) OF POWER PLANTS"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40e01/40e0181ca39a488cddcc1ac636e5c17a7540f0fb" alt="COMPARISON OF THE OVERALL PERFORMANCE (%) OF POWER PLANTS"
A combined cycle power plant generates electrical power in a more efficient way and is more respectful towards the environment than a coal or oil fired plant.
COMPARATIVE DATA IN RELATION TO A COAL FIRED POWER PLANT
USE OF THE BEST TECHNOLOGIES:
- Highly efficient combined cycles (55%).
- Low NOx turbines.
- Use of natural gas.
PROJECT DESIGN IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ENVIRONMENT:
- Adaptation to the scenario of existing emmissions.
- Accurate modelling of emissions.
NATURAL GAS COMBINED CYCLE:
- Decrease of 100% in SO2 emissions.
- Decrease of 80% in NOx emissions.
- Decrease of 50% in CO2 emissions.
SPECIFIC CO2 EMISSIONS BY TYPE OF FACILITY (gr./kW hour)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45c09/45c090395fbbf3b79adbbcce3a56b12ce0f7840a" alt="SPECIFIC CO2 EMISSIONS BY TYPE OF FACILITY (gr./kW hour)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae6c3/ae6c32a7edde372d2b37fa72b905647d1b49f907" alt="SPECIFIC CO2 EMISSIONS BY TYPE OF FACILITY (gr./kW hour)"
CONTAMINANT EMISSIONS BY ENERGY SOURCE(gr./kW hour)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45c09/45c090395fbbf3b79adbbcce3a56b12ce0f7840a" alt="CONTAMINANT EMISSIONS BY ENERGY SOURCE (gr./kW hour)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae6c3/ae6c32a7edde372d2b37fa72b905647d1b49f907" alt="CONTAMINANT EMISSIONS BY ENERGY SOURCE (gr./kW hour)"